Not Minding That It Hurts: Lawrence of Arabia


By Niall McArdle


lawrence_of_arabia_peter_otoole (Photo credit:

Every month my good friend Beanmimo has devilish fun putting together a fiendishly difficult movie trivia quiz. Recently he stupefied me with a piece of Lawrence of Arabia trivia. It seems impossible to imagine anyone other than Peter O’Toole as the effete and enigmatic T.E. Lawrence, the British soldier who was partial to Greek philosophy and who led a disparate group of Arab tribes against the Turks. And yet when the project was in development, none other than John Wayne was considered for the role. Yes, John Wayne. Try to picture Duke wrapped in robes and standing atop a sand dune or calling for an attack on Aqiba.

"Aqiba, Pilgrim!"
“Aqiba, Pilgrim!”

I was so flummoxed by the thought, it reminded me that I haven’t watched the film in some time. It is a magnificent spectacle, no doubt, beautifully shot by Freddie Young in “Super Panavision” 70mm widescreen.


Four hours of widescreen vistas of the desert and Maurice Jarre’s overwhelming score might be a little much to take, particularly as by the film’s end Lawrence still remains a mysterious figure. What exactly is his motivation? Is he in love with the idea of an Arab nation or is he simply determined to fulfil an Oxford-educated romantic notion of desert nomads? Is he there for Arabia or is he there for himself?

The British, who betray him and the Arabs at Damascus, regard him as a peculiar figure. The Arabs think he’s an Englishman who dreams of the desert, while the cynical American reporter thinks “he was also the most shameless exhibitionist since Barnum & Bailey.”

T.E. Lawrence
T.E. Lawrence

The film made a star of O’Toole: with his piercing blue eyes and blond hair, he’s almost a dead ringer for Lawrence. He improvised the scene where he admires his reflection in his dagger and looks at the shadow cast by his robes.


Among the British are Jack Hawkins (blustery), Anthony Quayle (who always looked slightly constipated to me), and Claude Rains (customarily smooth). Their Arab counterparts are played by a tent-chewing Anthony Quinn, a dignified Omar Sharif and a relaxed and wise Alec Guinness.

Arthur Kennedy is the reporter and Jose Ferrer is the Turk who tortures Lawrence as well as … well, it’s left to the audience to decide what else happens; Ferrer strips O’Toole and is rather taken with the paleness of his flesh and his lovely blue eyes. There are no women in Lawrence of Arabia.

David Lean directing 'Lawrence of Arabia'
David Lean directing ‘Lawrence of Arabia’

There was a time when David Lean made smaller, perfect films: Brief Encounter, Hobson’s Choice, Great Expectations. After The Bridge on the River Kwai, though, he fell in love with spectacle filmed in 70mm. Spectacle is all well and good, but I still think four hours is an awful long film. Still, it could be worse: it could star John Wayne.

I watched a beautifully restored version on DVD, and there is a 50th anniversary BluRay available too.

As is so often the way in Hollywood, there will be a remake. Two remakes, in fact.


7 thoughts on “Not Minding That It Hurts: Lawrence of Arabia

  1. Great stuff, and a fitting tribute to Mr O’Toole. I can think of few films of that time where there are no women in the cast at all, and I always considered this a deliberate nod to Lawrence’s sexuality, though it might just have been practical, who knows.
    It is a stunning work though, and considering how long ago it was made, remains a momentous piece of cinema, and my favourite film from David Lean. Here is my own very short review, from January this year.
    I cannot imagine John Wayne either, but then he was cast as Genghis Khan! Watch, and wonder…

    Regards from Norfolk, Pete.


    1. cheers. nice post; glad you mentioned ‘Brighton Rock’ and ‘Get Carter’:what a great bloody film. there are, in my opinion, only a few truly great British gangster films, with Get Carter at the top probably, closely followed by “a long good friday”


  2. Ahh…’The Searchers’, now you’re talking widescreen vistas.
    I didn’t actually mind the long running time of LOA. There was a long interval in the cinema, and a souvenir booklet to buy. It felt like a real evening out at the time, especially as I was only 11, and saw it in a West End cinema, comfy seats, great sound, and a huge widescreen presentation. Those were indeed the days…Regards mate, Pete.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s